Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robin P's avatar

Thanks Bill! I too feel things are starting to settle a tiny bit. I think our work will still be hard but there’s a feeling of a little more optimism.

I am so excited to read that “heat pumps outsold fossil fuel furnaces in the U.S. for the first time this year!“ per Leah Stokes.

And, thanks for the reference to Mary Annaïse Heglar‘s piece. This has stuck with me when she wrote: “But what if the thing that’s burning you out is the same thing burning the planet up? What if you can’t quit — quietly or otherwise — because to do so would be to give up on the future?” A sentiment I have felt.

Looking forward to 2023 and helping my local community to eat their carrots 🥕 in the IRA. Happy New Year!

Robin

Expand full comment
AlfredRoss's avatar

Bill I think you need to stop obsessing about the negativity on Twitter. It's everywhere. Get used to it. It was on Twitter before Musk and is there now. If you think it's worse than pre-Musk I expect that is based on your perspective. Stuff that would not get through censors now does so now the nastiness comes from both sides. I could say suck it up but that would not be nice. This is not a "fighting" comment" and I don't even pay a subscription. Maybe one day I will. When I start to see your writing making more sense and being more open to other perspectives. But Musk has done a big service to the Twitter community and made it a more viable and relevant platform. Many people that had been banned for posting anti-narrative comments have been allowed back. I particularly noticed this banning trend related to the COVID situation but I'm sure it was common in climate-related stuff too. I'm talking about qualified scientists and journalists and doctors that posted comments disagreeing or contesting the narratives around vaccines, COVID treatments etc. Banned forever to Twitter heaven but resurrected by Musk. Certainly Musk needs to temper the angry beasts that wade too far into crudeness and into insults and obscenities and I expect that will happen. But Bill, you are getting pretty close to some of these things in your substack so I think you might be the pot calling the kettle black. And as for Greta Thunberg, her comeback to the attack on her was just a crude response to crudeness. I don't see why you were impressed by that. She should have just ignored the attacker. Your comments about that person make it seem that his approach to criticism is the way all criticism of perspectives such as your's or Greta's are made. I think that is just not so. But by being so much on the "fighting" side, you are inviting this type of response. As for you opinions on climate change, you have the right to them. Many disagree with your extreme perspective, including myself and don't see that "renewable" "solutions" you promote as viable. So maybe if you work hard to convince instead of fighting and attacking you will be more respected and taken more seriously. I don't see that as now being the case outside of the group of the "converted" that I might say you preach to now. I'm happy to know your perspective but even moreso if presented in a reasonable way. Your fighting words just don't do that and they often make you look foolish. You clearly have some very strong views on climate change and how it should be addressed and I like to hear them. I'm not the only one. But without all the nastiness of your "fighting" words. Please. Maybe one day I'll even pay for a subscription.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?